COMMERCIAL-OFF-THE SHELF VENDOR SELECTION: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS AND TOPSIS

Authors

  • Vikram Bali JSS Academy of Technical Education, Noida, UP, India
  • Shivani Bali Jaipuria Institute of Management, Noida, India
  • Dev Gaur JSS Academy of Technical Education, Noida, UP, India
  • Sita Rani Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab-141006, India
  • Raman Kumar Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Ludhiana, Punjab-141006, India

Keywords:

COTS, Software, Vendor, Selection, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS), TOPSIS

Abstract

Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) component selection is considered a critical task in effectively developing a component-based software system (CBSS). COTS vendor selection involves selecting the right vendors who can provide reliable COTS components at a suitable price and on time. However, COTS vendor selection is commonly a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue” associated with many paradoxical criteria for which the decision maker’s knowledge may be uncertain and ambiguous. This paper attempts to present “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS) combined with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method” to appraise and choose the best COTS vendor under the environment of group decision-making while considering reliability, delivery time, compatibility, vendor support and functionality as benefit criteria. In contrast, price and maintenance are the cost criteria. The considered case study demonstrated the presented case effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

a

Published

2023-09-10

How to Cite

Vikram Bali, Shivani Bali, Dev Gaur, Sita Rani, & Raman Kumar. (2023). COMMERCIAL-OFF-THE SHELF VENDOR SELECTION: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS AND TOPSIS. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 6(2). Retrieved from https://oresta.org/menu-script/index.php/oresta/article/view/571