Prioritization of road transportation risks: An application in Giresun province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2003111mKeywords:
Road transportation, Road transportation risk factors, PIPRECIA, Fuzzy sets.Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine and rank the road transportation risk factors that are crucial for effective and economic supply chain management. Road transportation risk factors can be defined as equipment related risks, risk to be lost and disappearance, risks related to delivery and packaging, inadequacy of qualified personnel and technical equipment, risks caused from incompatibility to logistic information system/technology, security risk, compulsory reasons, risks originated from regulations and arrangements, risks related to waiting at customs gate and transport infrastructure based risks. Accordingly, fuzzy PIPRECIA as a multi-criteria ranking method was used to prioritize the risk factors. According to the results, while the transport infrastructure based risks criterion was found as the most important, the risk to be lost and disappearance factor was obtained as the least important one.
Downloads
References
Adams, J. (2010), Managing Transport Risks: What Works?, DRAFT, for, Risk, Theory, Handbook., Comment, welcomed. 1-31.
Badi, I., & Abdulshahed, A. (2019). Ranking the Libyan airlines by using full consistency method (FUCOM) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 1-14.
Bozanic, D., Tešić, D., & Kočić, J. (2019). Multi-criteria FUCOM–Fuzzy MABAC model for the selection of location for construction of single-span bailey bridge. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 132-146.
Budzynski, M, Tubis , A, & Jamroz, K. (2019), Identifying Selected Tram Transport Risks, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 603(4), 1-10.
Cavinato, J.L. (2004), Supply Chain Logistics Risks from the Back Room to the Board Room, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34 (5), 383-387.
Chen Y,S, Biwer, Y,M, Monette, A,F, Luna, R, Yoshimura, R, Detrick, C, Dunn, T, Maheras, S, Bhatnagar, S, & Kapoor, K. (2003), Resource Handbook On Transport Risk Assessment, International Journal of Radioactive Materials Transport , 14(1), 29-38.
Đalić, I., Stević, Ž., Karamasa, C., & Puška, A. (2020). A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: green supplier selection. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 126-145.
Durmić, E. (2019). Evaluation of criteria for sustainable supplier selection using FUCOM method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 91-107.
Enyinda, C., Mbah, C.H.N. & Ogbuehi, A. (2010), An Empirical Analysis of Risk Mitigation in The Pharmaceutical Industry Supply Chain: A Developing Country Perspective, Production and Operations Management, 52 (1), 45-54.
Erceg, Ž., & Mularifović, F. (2019). Integrated MCDM model for processes optimization in supply chain management in wood company. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(1), 37-50.
Erkut, E, & Ingolfsson, A. (2005), Transport Risk Models For Hazardous Materials: Revisited”, Operations Research Letters, 33(1), 81-89.
Ghazali, M,E,F. (2009), Operational Risks for Highway Projects in Malaysia”, Proceedıngs of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 41, 364-367.
Govindan, K. & Chaudhuri, A. (2016), Interrelationships of Risks Faced By Third Party Logistics Service Providers: A DEMATEL Based Approach, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 90, 177-195.
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yıldız, H. & Talluri, S. (2015), Supply Chain Risk Management: A Literature Review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031- 5069.
Hoffmann, P., Schiele, H. & Krabbendam, K. (2013). Uncertainty, Supply Risk Management and Their Impact on Performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19, 199-211.
İzer, A,D, (2017), Soğuk Zincir Lojistiği İçinde Risklerin Azaltılmasında Yeni Teknolojiler, 6.Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi 17-19 Mayıs 2017, Antalya.
Kara, M.E. & Fırat, S.Ü.O. (2015), Tedarik Zinciri Risk Yönetiminin Gelişmesini Tetikleyen Risk Olayları Üzerine Bir İnceleme, IV. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, 21-23 Mayıs 2015, Gümüşhane.
Khan, A, M. (2013), Risk Factors in Toll Road Life Cycle Analysis, Journal Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 9, 408-428.
Koban, E. & Keser, H. Y. (2015). Dış ticarette lojistik. (6. Baskı). Bursa, Türkiye: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
Korucuk, S & Erdal, H. (2018), AHP-VIKOR Bütünleşik Yaklaşımıyla Lojistik Risk Faktörlerinin ve Risk Yönetimi Araçlarının Sıralanması: Samsun İli Örneği, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3) , 282-305.
Korucuk, S. & Memiş, S. (2018). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimindeki Risk Faktörlerinin AHP İle Ölçülmesi: Erzurum İli Örneği. BEÜ SBE Derg.,7(2), 1036-1051.
Lazar, R E, Dumitrescu, M, & Stefanescu, I.(2001), Risk Assessment Of Hazardous Waste Transport - Perspectives of GIS Application”, 808.1-808.8, Slovenia.
Manuj, I. & Mentzer, J.T., (2008), Global Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3), 192-223.
Marković, V., Stajić, L., Stević, Ž., Mitrović, G., Novarlić, B., & Radojičić, Z. (2020). A Novel Integrated Subjective-Objective MCDM Model for Alternative Ranking in Order to Achieve Business Excellence and Sustainability. Symmetry, 12(1), 164.
Noriega,V,M, Moreno, E,L,X, Amor, R, A,A, Lozano, R,S,M, Galindo, F, Miranda, C,G & Lama, M, (2018), Livestock Hauliers’ Attitudes, Knowledge and Current Practices Towards Animal Welfare, Occupational Wellbeing and Transport Risk Factors: A Mexican Survey , Preventive Veterinary Medicine , 160, 76-84.
Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in mcdm models: Full consistency method (fucom). Symmetry, 10(9), 393.
Pezier, J. (2002), Operational Risk Management, ISMA Discussion Papers in Finance 2002-21, To appear in ‘Mastering Operational Risk ‘ FT-Prentice Hall, 2003.
Prakash, S., Soni, G. & Rothore, A.P.S., (2017), “Multi-Echelon Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design and Configuration Under Supply Risks and Logistics Risks”, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 28(1), 1742-7975.
Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics, 8(3), 457.
Stević, Ž., Stjepanović, Ž., Božičković, Z., Das, D. K., & Stanujkić, D. (2018). Assessment of conditions for implementing information technology in a warehouse system: A novel fuzzy piprecia method. Symmetry, 10(11), 586.
Tang, C.S., (2006). Perspectives in Supply Chain Risk Management, International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 451-488.
Tomašević, M., Lapuh, L., Stević, Ž., Stanujkić, D., & Karabašević, D. (2020). Evaluation of Criteria for the Implementation of High-Performance Computing (HPC) in Danube Region Countries Using Fuzzy PIPRECIA Method. Sustainability, 12(7), 3017.
Vesković, S., Milinković, S., Abramović, B., & Ljubaj, I. (2020). Determining criteria significance in selecting reach stackers by applying the fuzzy PIPRECIA method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), 72-88.
Wang, M. (2018), “Impacts of Supply Chain Uncertainty and Risk On The Logistics Performance”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(3), 689- 704.
Xin, C., Cui, Y. & Zhao, J., (2007), “Research on Some Problems in The Exploration of Project Logistics”, China Water Transport (Academic Version), 5, 206-208.
Zeng, R, & Song, D, (2015), “Risk Assessment of Road Transport in construction Logistic Based on Fuzzy Method, International Conference on Management Science, Education Technology, Arts, Social Science and Economics (MSETASSE 2015), 716-719.
