Improving organizational learning by sharing information through innovative supply chain in agro-food companies from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Authors

  • Adis Puška Institute for Scientific Research and Development Brčko district Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Aleksandar Maksimović Institute for Scientific Research and Development in Brcko District, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ilija Stojanović Institute for Scientific Research and Development in Brcko District, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta19012010175p

Keywords:

sharing information, innovative supply chain, organizational learning, partnership with customers and suppliers, structural equation model

Abstract

Innovation is essential for long-term success in business and companies need to develop an innovative supply chain to respond to environmental and market challenges. It is necessary to develop knowledge through organizational learning in order to strengthen the ability of companies to innovate. An innovative supply chain is the basis for developing innovation in companies. To improve its market position companies should continuously receive high quality information from participants in the supply chain by sharing information. The complexity of relationships within supply chain affecting organizational learning is the subject of this study. We conducted an empirical study focusing our attention on agro-food companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A questionnaire was used as a data collection tool applying random systematic sampling and a total of 159 companies took part in this study. The empirical findings showed that sharing of information has a significant linkage with an innovative supply chain, but only in establishing partnerships with customers. We confirmed that an innovative supply chain is essential for development of organizational learning and agile supply chain. The findings could assist the managers of agro-food companies in Bosnia and Herzegovina to improve their business. This study provides guidance for improving business using supply chains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Arlbjorn, J. S., de Haas, H. & Munksgaard, K. B. (2011). Exploring supply chain innovation. Logistics Research, 3(1), 3-18. doi: 10.1007/s12159-010-0044-3
2. Bag, S. (2018). Supplier Management and Sustainable Innovation in Supply Networks: An Empirical Study. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S176–S195. doi: 10.1177/0972150918760051
3. Baihaqi, I. & Sohal, A.S. (2013). The impact of information sharing in supply chains on organisational performance: an empirical study. Production Planning & Control, 24(8-9), 743-758, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2012.666865
4. Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119–140. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006
5. Chan, A. T. L., Ngai, E. W. T., & Moon, K. K. L. (2017). The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 486–499. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.006
6. Chavez, R., Fynes, B., Gimenez, C., Wiengarten, F. (2012). Assessing the effect of industry clockspeed on the supply chain management practice-performance relationship. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(3), 235-248, DOI: 10.1108/13598541211227081
7. Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M. & Tomochko, N. A. (2011). The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(3), 262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2010.05.003
8. Chen, S.-P., and Wu, W. Y. (2010). A Systematic Procedure to Evaluate an Automobile Manufacturer–Distributor Partnership. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3), 687–698. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.036
9. Eckerd, S., & Hill, J. A. (2012). The buyer‐supplier social contract: information sharing as a deterrent to unethical behaviors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(2), 238–255. doi: 10.1108/01443571211208641
10. Faraz, A., Sanders, N., Zacharia, Z., & Gerschberger, M. (2018). Monitoring type B buyer–supplier relationships. International Journal of Production Research, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1444285
11. Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A. & O’Loughlin, A. (2015). How Australian manufacturing firms perceive and understand the concepts of agility and flexibility in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(2), 248–281. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-12-2012-0546
12. Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O’Loughlin, A. (2016). Understanding and Development of Supply Chain Agility and Flexibility: A Structured Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 379–407. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12096
13. Gligor, D. M., Esmark, C. L., & Holcomb, M. C. (2015). Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile? Journal of Operations Management, 33-34, 71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008
14. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
15. Joshi, S. P., Verma, R., Bhasin, H. V., Kharat, M. G., & Kharat, M. G. (2016). Structural Equation Modelling of Determinants of Buyer–Supplier Relationship Improvement Strategies: Case of Indian Manufacturing Firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 12(2), 95–108. doi: 10.1177/2319510x16671556
16. Kawai, T., Sakaguchi, J., & Shimizu, N. (2013). Transition of buyer-supplier relationships in Japan. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 9(4), 427–447. doi: 10.1108/jaoc-07-2011-0033
17. Kembro, J., & Näslund, D. (2014). Information sharing in supply chains, myth or reality? A critical analysis of empirical literature. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 44(3), 179–200. doi: 10.1108/ijpdlm-09-2012-0287
18. Kim, K. T., Lee, J. S., & Lee, S.-Y. (2017). Chain reactions of a collaborative buyer–supplier relationship: the mediating role of relationship quality on innovation performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1366267
19. Lee, C., & Ha, B.-C. (2018). The impact of buyer-supplier relationships’ social capital on bi-directional information sharing in the supply chain. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 00–00. doi: 10.1108/jbim-01-2017-0021
20. Lee, V-H., Ooi, K-B., A. Chong, Y-L., & Seow, C. (2014). Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: An empirical analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 6983-6994. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.022
21. Li, K., Liu, X.-Y., & Jacobson, D. (2017). Information and profit sharing between a buyer and a supplier: Theory and practice. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(1), 79–90. doi: 10.1002/mde.2870
22. Li, Y., Ye, F. & Sheu, C. (2014). Social capital, information sharing and performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(11), 1440-1462. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2013-0132
23. Mohezar, S., & Nor, M. N. M. (2014). Could supply chain technology improve food operators’ innovativeness? A developing country’s perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 38(1), 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.04.003
24. Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.005
25. Prajogo, D., Chowdhury, M., Yeung, A.C.L., & Cheng, T.C.E. (2012). The relationship between supplier management and firm’s operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 123-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.022
26. Rogers, H., & Fells, R. (2018). Successful buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 205556361876303. doi: 10.1177/2055563618763037
27. Sanz-Valle, R., Naranjo-Valencia, J., Perez-Caballero, D. J. (2011). Linking organizational learning with technical innovation and organizational culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 997-1015. doi: 10.1108/13673271111179334
28. Shou, Z., Yang, L., Zhang, Q., & Su, C. (2013). Market munificence and inter-firm information sharing: The moderating effect of specific assets. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2130–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.039
29. Tai, Y., & Ho, C. (2010). Effects of information sharing on customer relationship intention. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(9), 1385–1401. doi: 10.1108/02635571011087446
30. Yang, J., (2014). Supply chain agility: Securing performance for Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.018
31. Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2014). Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2013.11.001
32. Wang, L., Yeung, J. H. Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 114-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.006
33. Zacharia, Z. G., Nix, N. W. & Lusch, R. F. (2011). Capabilities that Enhance Outcomes of an Episodic Supply Chain Collaboration. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 591–603. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2011.02.001

Published

2018-12-19

How to Cite

Puška, A., Maksimović, A., & Stojanović, I. (2018). Improving organizational learning by sharing information through innovative supply chain in agro-food companies from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta19012010175p